4K Portable Monitor, 16" 3840x2400 IPS Laptop Screen, 1500:1, 400 Nits Screen USB C HDMI Computer Gaming Display with Speakers & Smart Cover, Travel Monitor for PC Phone PS5/4 Xbox Switch

So far it's Fantastic, crispy, runs well, is low power and portable. It's all I ever needed, 10/10 on Ease, Gaming looks good as well

Still fully evaluating the screen, but to date it does everything I expected and the screen quality very good.

DISPLAY: Pretty sharp, decently wide viewing angle, minimal glare or reflection. Also it is very light and takes both power and video just fine from my Macbook pro. It is fairly bright. However the black levels are pretty washed out, and no amount of adjustments help. I wouldn't used this for any visually critical work like photo editing.DESIGN: The bevel is fairly thin, with a larger portion on the bottom. Overall it looks nice and pretty slim. The buttons, however, are super tiny and using the menu is very tedious because of their arrangment. They are in a row on the left side with power button on top, followed by menu/enter, up, down, and back. And again they are tiny and all crammed next to each other. I continually press the wrong button when making adjustments. Also all of the video connections are on one side, the right. I find this get's in the way sometimes and wish there was at least a USB-C port on both sides.My only other concern is that the display feels pretty flimsy. I'm not sure how it will hold up long term, especially since it's meant to be tossed in your bag and taken everywhere.Overall I think I'll keep it because it was a good value, but if money were no object I'd probably check out a few other manufacturers.

Its lightweight and plug n play. Perfect mobile dual monitor solution for laptops

This is a review of the MAGICRAVEN 16" 4K Portable Monitor.The listing for this monitor claims a resolution of 4K, 3840x2400 pixels. That is a bald-faced LIE.It is actually a 3072x1920 panel with poor-quality interpolated downscaling. It would seem that the manufacturer is counting on nobody actually looking closely at the pixels, but it is unmistakably NOT a 4K monitor. I can only assume they really wanted to call it a 4K monitor, because they presumed that "3K monitor" doesn't sound like something that will sell.The monitor itself continues to lie to your computer, reporting itself as a 4K, 3840x2400 display. Because of this, your computer sends it a 3840x2400 image, which the monitor then downscales (using a poor interpolation engine straight from the 1990's) to the panel's native resolution of 3072x1920.I have attached two photos. The first is a close-up shot of a small area of my MacBook Pro's screen, showing part of an image (of an emulated 1980's Mac screen) at 1:1 resolution (that is, one pixel of the image is one pixel on the screen). Although the photo shows an area of the screen about 1.5" wide, you can see despite the extreme close-up that the pixels are all clear and precise.The second photo is of the MAGICRAVEN 16" so-called 4K monitor, attempting to show the same image, again with one image pixel per screen pixel -- at least what the display is reporting as screen pixels. You can see that the pixels are interpolated and distorted. Pairs of black and white pixels are smeared together to create moire patterns, an unmistakeable fingerprint of interpolation. The image is blurred and the text is very difficult to read, even under magnification like this. You can see from the checkerboard pattern background and the "c" and "e" letters at the left side that very 5 pixels of the image are interpolated onto 4 pixels of the panel. This shows that the true panel resolution is 4/5 of 3840x2400, which is 3072x1920, a less common but standard panel size.The especially sad thing about this is that it could have been a nice display. While it's nowhere near the quality of the MacBook Pro screen, at 3K 3072x1920 resolution it has the same actual physical pixel density as the 16" MacBook Pro's 226ppi "Retina" screen, and at the 16" size, 3K is a much more practical resolution.If this display had been programmed to honestly report its panel's resolution, I probably would have been thrilled with it. I was looking for a display with about 226dpi and couldn't find one, settling on this MAGICRAVEN display instead, with its claimed 283ppi instead (matching pixel density means text and images on one screen match those of the other screen). It even has a VESA mount, not always present on these "portable" displays.But even its use as a 3K display is ruined by their deception. Because the monitor reports its native resolution as 3840x2400 -- and does NOT report that it is capable of 3072x1920 -- any image it is sent gets interpolated, resulting in blurred text and distorted, smeared fine detail in images. This display at the best settings I could come up with is still considerably more blurry than a similar 2K portable display I have which cost far less.I'm returning this monitor.

Amazing color and clarity.

The Monitor inputs starting failing and caused the monitor to constantly reboot BUT the seller support reached out to me to make it right. They sent me a replacement unit and no cost way past the Amazon 30 day warranty and the replacement works perfect.Technology doesn’t always work the way we hope but where that sometimes fails, excellent customer service can still make it right and they did. Most sellers should take note from this one.

I bought this monitor to use in vertical orientation, mostly for coding and/or office work. The 18" size and the 2.5K resolution on paper looked great. I didn't really care about the high refresh rate. Size wise it was perfect accompanying a 27" 5K monitor.The good : This monitor is very slim and light. it is easy to carry with you if that is what you are looking for. The single USB-C connection with out the need for the A/C adapter is also a big plus.The bad : The controls on the monitor is not intuitive at all and almost annoying. This monitor is actually going to be returned and the main reason for it is that ( this could be a fault of MacOS) the text is only sharp at low resolutions. When you go to its highest resolution the text seems distractingly bad and small and anything in between is also not good. Again this might have something to do with how MacOS handles resolution but I am not sure.