NikonNIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Mirrorless Camera Lens JMA709DA

I bought a Nikon Z7 in a bundle that included the 24-70mm f/4.0 lens. I thought this lens was a somewhat expensive upgrade to that bundled lens, but since I was taking a trip that would offer many opportunities for photos, I decided to splurge. Having now finished that trip and downloaded the photos, I am quite impressed with the output of this lens. There were definitely some lower light shots that were made possible by this lens that the f/4.0 could not have captured, as well as some shots where I really shortened the field depth and allowed the background to bokeh beautifully.While this lens is noticeably heavier than f/4.0 lens in the bundle, that is unavoidable due to marked increase in the optics of the lens. Moreover, compared to other f/2.8 lenses, it is fairly compact at 89x126mm and among the lightest in the category with a weight of 805g. I thought the weight difference between the f/4.0 and the f/2.8 might be a problem by upsetting the balance of the camera, but that never emerged. I initially noted the extra weight compared to the f/4.0, but within minutes, I got used to the camera's new feel. I never felt out of balance, and enjoyed the experience of shooting with the new lens immediately.Beyond the actual photographic output of the lens, from a usage standpoint, I was most impressed with the focusing. The lens has two synchronized AF drive units, and it enables the lens to focus very quickly and with impressive accuracy. I found this to be most helpful when shooting video because a moving subject could stay in focus without effort, however even for photos when I was not focusing manually, I noted how quickly it focused. It's noticeably faster than the f/4.0.While this lens is certainly an investment, I think its performance justifies its cost. I am happy I bought it. I think for a professional, this f/2.8 is an essential workhorse. However, even if you are an amateur who likes to have top-notch tools, this lens is remarkable, and it's an incredible upgrade from the f/4.0.

About me: I primarily shoot video. When I am doing photography, I am usually shooting product, cityscape, nightscape, or night sky.I was skeptical of the new Z-mount. When I bought the Z 6, I was hopeful to use autofocus with video. At first, I was content to keep using my F-mount glass through the adapter. Two things changed my mind: 1) the awful noise of F-mount glass when doing video AF 2) I felt that the focus breathing was distracting from the subject.So, I purchased the Z-mount 24-70mm 2.8 S. After a month of use; I can say that this lens is incredible! The focus is silent and fast for video AF. Additionally, Nikon advertised that they worked on focus breathing for this lens and it performs amazingly.There is one item that has been a little frustrating, and that is the aperture ring. I frequently use my pinky there to help balance heavier lenses. I find myself changing the aperture accidentally when using this lens. I believe there is a way to turn this off in-camera and that may make this a non-issue for me. I will explore and report back.The attributes that would cause me to recommend this lens 1) extra stops of VR compared to using and adapted F-Mount lens 2) Silent & Fast video AF 3) Lack of Focus breathing 4) sharpness (it is brilliant, really it is) 5) quality build (ring operation is smooth and a metallic body that looks and feels great!)I have never owned the 24-70 f4 S. For those debating between the two, I have been told that they are very similar in performance and that the main difference is weight/size and maximum aperture. Most of my shooting is in low light, which is why I opted for the f2.8. If you consider your needs, I don't think there is a wrong answer between the two.

This is the best 24-70 I’ve ever used. The image quality, sharpness, contrast, color is better than my f-mount Nikon primes. Since buying this lens, I’ve sold my Nikon 85mm 1.8 G, Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art, and the Nikon 24-70 F4 Z mount kit lens, simply because they became obsolete the moment I put this lens (24-70 f2.8 S) on my Z 6 and Z 6ii. In my opinion it’s far better than the 24-70 f4 S kit lens. The f4 kit lens seems clinical and has a mundane-fine quality to the images... where the 24-70 2.8 S has a beautiful artful rendering quality to the images. I’ve stayed away from 24-70 lenses in the past because this focal range is just so standard and boring... but this lens has converted me.

This is the best lens I've ever owned. As a semi pro photographer for over 17 years, I've owned a lot of glass. This is without a doubt the best glass I've ever owned. Sharp from edge to edge and perfect in the center. Completely silent and fast autofocus.If I could only have one lens, this would be it.

I really struggled with deciding to get this or a Nikon F mount 24-70 (Nikon, Tamron, sigma) but I'm very happy with the lens I got. It's pricey but it focuses fast, silently, and accurately. Image quality is incredible at every focal length. And it just feels incredible in the hand. Its a bit weighty and chunky but if feels so solid and feels like a lens costing 2.4k. The manual focus and programmable rings feel alright. It doesn't physically focus the lens like F mount lens and instead uses focus by wire (electronic). But the delay from moving the ring to having the lens change focus is very fast and feels responsive. It feels miles better than what I experienced with some Fuji and Sony lens (although usually cheaper lens on older cameras).DXOmark also rated this the best 24-70 they ever tested and I gotta say I have no regrets shelling a ton of money for this lens. It's the nicest lens I've ever handled and it feels like it will last me a very long time

Having purchased a Nikon Z8 this year, I needed to replace my wonderful 70-200 lens with a Z model. The older lens worked well enough on the Nikon converter but its extra projection and massive weight was just too much for me to cope with. I am ultra pleased with the new lens and it was definitely worth the money. Its focus is far slicker that the older model and of course it takes advantage of all the facilities afforded by the Z8. In comparative tests, I am amble to get closer to subjects for close up work than with the older model and the depth of field at full aperture is delightfully shallow with a nice bokeh behind the subject. It is still a heavy lens but with less projection the weight is much earlier to cope with (I am unable to walk well so stability with a heavy camera /lens is a big issue for me). The price on Amazon was an amazing discount to the normal main players and delivery was fast with the lens very well packed. I am a very happy purchaser!!

Un objetivo súper versátil con una nitidez espectacular, peso un poco alto, pero de muy buen material, con un estabilizador brutal.Recomiendo 100x100.

Top per professionisti de Settore, costa tanto ma la qualità è altissima! Con la nikon Z6II è una meraviglia

Acheté en "reconditionné" essentiellement pour remplacer le 14-24 2.8 F décidément trop encombrant sur les boitiers Z avec la FTZ et compliqué d'emploi avec sa grosse lentille proéminente et sa tendance au flare, j'ai été conquis par cet objectif. Sa qualité est comparable à mes fixes pour l'usage que j'en ai vu jusqu'à présent (photo d'intérieurs). Je possède aussi le 14-30 f/4, qui est déjà très bon mais celui là est nettement supérieur, en particulier par son ergonomie identique à celle du 24-70 f/2.8. Je compte l'utiliser cet été pour des paysages de nuit et revendre le 14-30.

Moin,nach inzwischen knapp 15 Jahren fotografieren mit DSLR bzw. nun auch Systemkameras hat sich der Anspruch an das Equipment stetig gesteigert.Ich betreibe es an einer z6 IINach viel Ringen, ob ich eine solche Ausgaben tätigen soll, hat es sich am Ende mehr als gelohnt: Die Schärfe, das unfassbar schöne Bokeh, der Autofokus, der schneller ist, als ich fassen kann, dazu die hervorragende Korrektur sämtlicher Bildfehler, die man von anderen Objektiven kennt…. Kurz um diese 70-200 ist scheinbar das perfekte Objektiv, dass ich seit so vielen Jahren schon so gerne schon immer gehabt hätte.Kontrast? Top!Weiche Kanten? Nix da! Farbverachiebung bei z. B. nassen Steinen im prallen Licht? Nix da. (Googelt mal das Sony 50mm 1.8 … unglaublich!)Gegenlichtverhalten? Kein Problem mehr.Eine LED Strassenlampe im dunklen von unten fotografiert und man kann erkennen, wo der Elektriker die Leitungen anschlossen hat und welche Farbe die Aderendhülsen haben. Krass.Selbst die Fasern und Fussel an Blättern vor der untergehenden Sonne werden abgebildet, wie ich es noch nicht erlebt habe. Man kann sogar kleine Läuse und Fruchtfliegen erkennen und unterscheiden (an den Flügeln).Mir ist gestern Abend aufgefallen, dass ein Foto, dass ich vor einigen Jahren mit einer D7200 mit Tamron 28-75 2.8 im Tierpark aufgenommen habe, im Vergleich mit dem was jetzt möglich ist, aussieht wie ein Handyfoto. Es ist unglaublich.Der einzige Mini Wermutstropfen ist tatsächlich die Größe und das Gewicht. Doch selbst wenn man nur eine Hecke fotografiert und sich das Bild anschaut, wird einem klar, dass das Gewicht völlig egal ist. So derbe krass ist die Bildqualität, dass dieses Objektiv über alle Zweifel erhaben ist.Und da das Gewicht vorm Kauf klar ist… kein Punkteabzug und ich vergebe trotz des Preises 5+ Sterne.Update: Nach zwei Monaten mit dem Objektiv muss ich gestehen, dass es das mit Abstand beste Objektiv ist, dass ich jemals gesehen oder getestet habe. Ich bin so unfassbar Glücklich über die Ergebnisse, dass ich mich bei viele Aufnahmen Frage, wie diese so wunderbaren Bilder auf die Karte in meiner Kamera gekommen sind... unglaublich gut.