Bendix Premium PRT5898 Rear Brake Rotor for Select Models Ford Edge, Explorer, Flex, Taurus, Taurus X, Lincoln MKS, MKT, MKX, Mercury Sable

No issues after install - no warpage like some rotors get when sitting on the shelf for too long. Installed into a 2012 Elantra.

These fit perfectly, are doing very well, would purchase again when needed, also used Bendix brake pads with complete installation. They are quiet, no Ill effects.

Good quality and price- should work out for a long time. Used on 2017 Sienna. Easy installation.

High quality steel. Been using Bendix for years and they never disappoint. Smooth and consistent braking. Installed quickly as a direct OEM replacement part should. Fitment for a 2014 Captiva front rotor confirmed.

This is written by someone who has a lot of experience with cars over the decades, but who is NOT A BRAKES EXPERT. Be sure to do your own homework when making brake parts decisions. Amazon says that this part fits my vehichle even though the part is notably different from the manfacturer's original part.This rotor is different from the stock one that came on the rear of my 2014 Ford Explorer Sport all-wheel-drive. I decided to replace the original one because it was damaged by a failed brake pad which ended up scarring the heck out of the rotor. I did not realize the difference in the replacement rotor until I went to mount it. This one is about an inch smaller in diameter, and is solid vs double-walled/vented. This also means that is about 11.5 mm thick instead of 17mm thick.A new rear rotor set (pair) is about $122. But I got this single rotor for $20. I was going to return it because I thought it was not compatible with my vehicle (even though Amazon said it was, which is why I purchased it), but found on autozone they sell a single one for $67 that looks exacly the same.For now, I am going to keep this one on the passenger rear, and will return the second one I got, thus keeping the original driver's side rear rotor and replacing only the brake pads, because that rotor seems fine with minimal wear. The implications of this thinner/smaller rotor are that it won't have as much heat dissipation capability as the originial style, and that the edge of the rotor will cut into the brake pads since it has a smaller diameter. I will keep a close eye on this thinner replacement one to see how it does. But for $20, I am content with the deal.What is most important to me is that the FRONT rotors and brakes are the absolute best since the front handles about 60% of the breaking and the rear 40% (the front brake pads appear to be about double the size of the rear ones.Final word of advice: Check your manufacturer's specs on thickness and diameter and compare it to the advertized rotors you are looking to purchase before you buy.I hope this review helps someone else.(7/25/2024 update. This brake rotor has been doing fine since I posted my original review).

2010 Dodge nitro 4x4 Excellent. Smooth. No vibrate. Perfect fit. These rotors have a the perfect cross hatch lines on them...and anyone in the machinst field understands that cross hatch lines mean the metal is good square and tru. Fantastic.

Fit was good and is working perfectly.

The most frustrating thing about bad parts isn’t the general hassle of returning said part, it’s spending 3 days wondering why your wheels keep seizing up after tightening the lug bolts and convincing yourself it’s not an issue with the part, but user error. I checked and rechecked my brake pads and calipers. I fastidiously removed every scrap of rust and cleaned everything. I watched video after video trying to figure out what I did wrong. Then, I had the idea to measure these new rotors and compare them to my old ones. Lo and behold, these crap sandwiches are nearly half an inch thicker than the old ones. Unbelievable. Can this garbage company pay me for not only the hours of work I invested in trying to install but for taking three days off of my job? How I wish they would. At any rate, Jeep xj owners beware. Avoid these like the plague.