







🗂️ Elevate your card game with Vault X — where protection meets prestige!
Vault X 9 Pocket Sideloading Pages offer 50 double-sided A4 pages designed to securely store up to 900 collectible cards. Crafted from archival-safe, non-PVC material with a lightweight padded layer, these black sideloaders protect cards from damage while fitting most D-ring binders. Ideal for trading card enthusiasts seeking premium protection and sleek organization.










| ASIN | B07F83JT23 |
| Best Sellers Rank | 19,876 in Toys & Games ( See Top 100 in Toys & Games ) 1 in Trading Card Refills |
| Brand | Vault X |
| Brand Name | Vault X |
| Colour | Black |
| Country Of Origin | China |
| Customer Reviews | 4.6 out of 5 stars 1,671 Reviews |
| Global Trade Identification Number | 05060570200205 |
| Item Dimensions L x W | 30L x 23.9W centimetres |
| Item Weight | 850 Grams |
| Item weight | 850 Grams |
| Manufacturer | Vault X |
| Material | Non-PVC material |
| Material Type | Non-PVC material |
| Max input sheet capacity | 900 |
| Maximum Sheet Capacity | 900 |
| Number of Pieces | 450 |
| Paper Size | A4 |
| Style | Sideloading |
| Unit Count | 1.0 count |
S**B
You need this for your card binder
I spent ages looking for the perfect binder and card loader pages for my Pokemon collection and after alot of procrastination (and my toddler nearly destroying my cards) I finally purchased a binder (highly recommended the Ultra Pro UPRRPJ8-2 Album Card Collector) and card loader pages to protect and conserve my cards. Of course with Amazon if you want something it'll arrive the next day and it did with both items. The pages look rich and classy and really gives a prestigious feel to your prized cards. The pages are sturdy with pockets on both sides of the page, so one page holds 18 cards. The folder is firm with a nice leather feel to it. Nothing too fancy, perfect and simple. So if you want to protect your cards and keep them safe buy these products and you won't regret it!
G**T
A must for all Trading Card Collectors
Vault X produces the best products for card storage bar none. I've replaced all of the Ultra Pro pages with these Vault X Sideload pages for my MTG cards and cannot recommend them enough. No more cards falling out and potentially getting damaged from toploading pages. The cards are held in place well, with just enough room for a card sleeve to fit nicely. The black pages look fantastic, are great quality and i'll never use anything else as long as they're available. Bit more expensive than the others available, but absolutely worth it. Great product. And Vault X, if you read this, any chance you could add some decent quality 3 ring binders to your line?
A**H
Excellent quality and price, collect like a pro
Excellent for storing my pokemon card collection, the side loading is fast to insert and exit cards kept in protectors, thus stop dust getting in from all sides. They are easy to use and flick through any collection you might have. Also a great price for 50, as other places are ripping us off at only 10 or 15 for £15! Love the black colour, makes the cards pop even more, everything looks so professional I love them!
C**D
Amazing product, I just have some minor personal problems with it
Amazing product all around. Cards fit nicely, easy to pop cards in, feels durable, and is certainly worth the money! I can see why people have suggested Vault X to me for binders, card sleeves, and so on. However I do have 2 problems, 1 isn’t a problem with the product itself The listing says 50pc, but mine only came with 48, so instead of having space for 900 cards, I only have space for 864, if it weren’t for that error I’d have rated 5 stars without a doubt My second problem isn’t with this product, but more so buying the pages. I collect Pokemon TCG cards and bought these pages and a D ring binder to hold 1 of each Pokemon in card form, which is currently 1025 if I’m correct, but you can only buy the pages in packs of 50, no more, no less, meaning if I want to hold all 1025 Pokemon, or really any from generation 9, I have no choice but to buy another 50 pages, which is way more than needed I understand there may be reason for it, but being able to buy something like a 10 pack of pages would be great, giving me enough to add gen 9 and have more pages for the future. The listing for the Vault X D ring binder states 50+ pages, so I just wish I could add just a few more pages without having to buy another 50
A**R
You can add cards with sleeves on both side. Good quality
You can add cards with sleeves on both side. Good quality
O**P
Vault-X 9 pocket side loading pages a good alternative to the new shortened UG 18 pocket pages
Thanks to Vault-x I can continue storing cards that are sleeved in the oversized FFG grey sleeves or in Ultra Pro penny sleeves. I store cards from Arkham LCG, LOTR LCG, and magic the gathering in an UP penny sleeves and then in a “Sideloader - 9-Pocket (doubled sided 18) A4 Trading Card Binder Page”. For Arkham LCG I put 2 player cards in a UG penny sleeve and the investigators I put in an FFG grey sleeve and then in a binder page. For LOTR LCG I put three player cards in a UP penny sleeve and the hero’s in a FFG sleeve, then these go in a binder page. For MTG all rares and mythics are sleeved with a tight-fit UP sleeve and then stored in a penny sleeve in a binder pocket. Storing cards in a penny sleeve and then in a pocket of a binder page keeps the card in the pocket because the penny sleeves keep the cards from sliding partly out. Until now (end of 2021/early 2022) I was using Ultimate Guard 18 pocket side loading pages for this. Then Ultimate guard (probably somewhere 2020/2021) decided to shorten their pages by almost 1 cm. After that size change the UG pages no longer fit Ultra Pro Penny or FFG grey sleeves. Why UG would shorten their pages by almost 1 cm beats me. It is inconsistent, it also looks ugly having a mix of two sizes pages in a binder, not to mention that this also means that when you stand your binders up straight, the weight of the pages is on the longer binder pages because those stick out at the bottom about 0.5 cm and I assume there is a risk of the cards in the bottom row of the pages folding a bit. Bottom line to change the size of a succesful product to me sounds like a pretty stupid move from UG. Note that even cards in Dragon shields sleeves no longer fit easily in the new sized UG pages, in particular in the middle row of the new UG pages, which is the smallest of the three rows. I included a picture with a Vault-x page on the bottom, old size UG purple page in the middle and new size UG page on top. The difference between the new and old UG page is almost 1 cm. The old UG purple page is (almost) exactly the same size as the Vault X page. Last year when I found out that UG had changed the size of their 18 pocket pages because I bought a new batch with the smalle size. I returned all of them and I went looking for alternatives. First I tried the Gamegenic 18 pocket pages, thinking since this is the brand that replaced the original FFG sleeves their pages would fit FFG sleeves. But the Gamegenic pages were also smaller then the original UG binder pages. This is probably because the gamegenic Gray sleeves that replaced FFG grey sleeves are also shorter (about 2-3 mms) then the original FFG grey sleeves. Then I searched for information “which side loading binder pocket pages would fit FFG grey sleeves”. I found, based on stories of others that ran into the same joke from UG, that Dragon Shield and Ultra Pro pages didn’t fit UP penny sleeves either (weird that UP pages don’t fit their own UP penny sleeves). I also noticed that most brands do not include the exact size of the pages or the pocket size in their product descriptions. What use to me is the size of the box they come in, to me ? Really annoying having to go buy, try and return a product. Luckily I also found the Vault-X pages based on this search. The Vault-X pages are almost exactly the same size as the original UG pages. The Vault-X pages do fit FFG grey and UP penny sleeves in all three rows with a little wiggle room. If at all I was to have one comment about the Vault-X pages is that they should make all three rows exactly the same height. The bottom row is the largest and the middle row the shortest. The difference is a bit over 1 mm and the middle row is the tightest fit as a result. So for consistency purposes Vault-X should really consider moving about 0.5 mm from the bottom to the middle row. But regardless of that all three rows do today fit FFG grey sleeves and UP penny sleeves. The Vault-X 50 pages packs each came in a plastic bag inside an Amazon paper envelope. I ordered four 50 page packs and received for separate packages from Amazon (in one same delivery moment). Weird but maybe this is cheaper because it didn’t have to come in a box ? I am in the Netherlands but ordered from Amazon.co.Uk because the Vault X pages where not available locally and amazon.de or amazon.fr either didn’t have them or they were not in stock. Durability I don’t know yet but they feel and look and feel good. Value for money is good. Cost wise the Vault-X pages were better then the UG ones. I bought 4 packs of 50 pages for roughly £68 and £5 delivery (roughly 88 Euro). This was including VAT and not sure why but I did not have to pay any additional import fees (which would still have been fine ). Sturdiness is good, they have a similar sturdiness as the old UG pages.
A**E
Good, but kind of as expected.
Hard to argue with these, I've been buying side loaders in pre-built books, these seem to be good quality, and fit well with the products they're designed for.
S**U
Great product
Amazing and well worth the investment to protect your cards, although much more expensive than the competition. I have been using UltraPro pockets for years, but this is now the 2nd set of these VaultX sideloaders I have bought and I have transferred all of my cards into them (+ other VaultX binders). I have found that the cards + sleeves stick out very slightly from the top of UltraPro pockets and can get dust/mess into them, the benefit of the VaultX sideloaders is that they prevent this. These can also be filled from both front and back and have a thin soft protection layer in the middle.
TrustPilot
4天前
1 周前