Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Penguin Classics)

Arrived in great condition. The print is easy and comfortable to read. This work is not a light read. Definitely recommend.

like it

This is a work of profound genius. The reviews here who have taken it literally have missed the point (sadly). This is a book about desire and its flow, cosmically, socially, culturally, tribally, economically, humanly, individually. It includes elements of economics (capitalism, marx) or psychoanalytic concepts (schizophrenia, Oedipus) as models/codes, territories and flows thereof, as tools/structures off of which they bounce their ideas - perhaps a lens through which to view the highly abstract nature of the sub/unconscious and their theory of desire, if you prefer.This book will change the way you think about the world - and agree or not with its thesis or commentaries, any book that does that deserves five full stars.

I am only half way through this book, and it has been superb.Here is the quote that began to shift my conception of what psychoanalysis is:"The real is not impossible; on the contrary, within the real everything is possible, everything becomes possible. Desire does not express a molar lack within the subject; rather, the molar organization deprives desire of its objective being"(37).

Shipped on schedule and book is in great condition as expected. It's hard to read, but super interesting!

As far as the order, it came in a timely fashion - although their are some minor typos in the press.As far as the content of the book, I have mixed feelings - this book is a hot mess. The best thing anyone could say about it is what Foucault states in the preface, about the book being more a work of art than a great theoretical system (like Kant, or Hegel lets say). And I'll accept the book as that, just art. The book starts off very strong, but, once you realize the authors are basically saying the same thing ten different ways, it loses its magic.The read itself can be difficult at times, but, it is very well paced, so that once you trudge through enough technical philosophy, things open up quite brilliantly - like having gotten through the forest into the open field. That feeling in-itself, ends up being a highlight of the book in a sense. The philosophy itself is messy, lacks focus towards the end, is packed far too much with neologisms, and in many ways ends up seeming unoriginal. The concept of a "Body Without Organs" aside - Essentially you have a Spinozist materialism that integrates itself with Freud, Marx, Nietzsche, and a bunch of others far too obscure for most readers to have any reference to. This is also a weakness of the text, as it is not very accessible (even to philosophers) in terms knowing whether the authors' interpretations of these other writers are actually spot on, or not. This makes critical analysis a daunting task, coupled with the neologisms, and messy layout of ideas.Another critique is that (being someone who has worked extensively, and intimately with the mentally ill - most notably schizophrenics - for many years) I wonder about the depth of understanding of schizophrenia. Philosophy proper, yes - economics, sure - a properly thoughtful and empirical sense of schizophrenia? I am doubtful. Guattari, maybe - but I am very skeptical that Deleuze has any significant experience with schizophrenics, and in fact, in the text, most references to schizophrenia are from other peoples case notes/research - notably, the authors who themselves malign Freud. ... I also have a hard time getting past the vast amount of undue credit given to Oedipus as an institution, and deeply engrained unconscious pattern, social, and individual.Still, if one approaches the book as a work of art, its fantastic, entertaining, and at times hilarious. All criticism aside, the book has a compelling sense of mystery that it instills, a wonderful aesthetic. This alone can bring me back to this book, for likely, the rest of my life. There are grand moments of detailed, original, philosophy (the Body Without Organs being a shining display), they are just, well, mixed in with a whole lot of other stuff that maybe the book could have done without.

Anti Oedipus is just so important man. The liberation of desire, ending the totalitarian reign of Freudian hermeneutics, this is all important and progressive. However, sometimes one is left with a fear about what exactly it will look like to go off their deep end. I suppose thats the point though, and not something D and G are all too worried about. I am, though...

And really, really, really hard to follow.Trust me, this is one that'll make your head hurt.If Nietzsche was tough, don't cross into this, it's going to scramble your brain.But if you're like me and you like that sort of thing, then this is your Mecca.