UGREEN Revodok Max 213 13-in-1 Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station, 40Gbps High Speed Data Transfer, 2 Screen Expansion, 4K@60Hz, Single Output 8K@30Hz, 90W, PD, 2.5Gbps Ethernet, SD/TF 4.0 Card, 3.5mm

Increíble, súper conectividad y velocidad!!! Calidad de construcción y materiales impecable!

Le meilleur HUB USBC que j'ai essayé. Excellent sur mon MAC avec plusieurs périphériques et un écran Ultrawide. Tout fonctionne parfaitement après 3 mois.

I’ve had this dock for a month and it works perfectly good I run it using a M4 Max and under heavy loads it does get warm but only when I’m pushing my Mac to the Max using Davinci and editing a 4K timeline with masking effects de-noising and colour grading and I’m running a dual monitor set up

This dock has worked steadily without problems out-of-the-box, supporting a Dell XPS running Ubuntu 25.04+. I have a 4k display connected with a (UGreen) USB-C to DP 1.4 cable, and another ancient display connected to the built-in DP port with an old DP 1.1 cable. I expect everything would work fine with earlier kernels and other cables, as well. I saw a review mentioning troubles with HDMI. DisplayPort is actually a preference for me, because HDMI is proprietary and seemed like it might eventually invite 3rd party drivers on Linux, whereas DP is an open standard. So I haven't even tried HDMI. The USB-C to DP cable was not expensive, and gave me no trouble. (I did have to change settings on a monitor to select DP input.) I like that the fast USB-A ports are on the front. Slower USB-A ports in the back are perfect for keyboard and mouse, and if you want an attached SSD or something, you have more TB/USB-C in the back. But if you want to dynamically connect something, you want the faster USB-A ports to be in the front, right? Why don't others get that? The box is shockingly heavy. I imagine they would've wanted it lighter, if possible, but were forced to make it heavy. Perhaps it's unavoidable, if you want a robust power supply? I previously tried a (reconditioned) Dell WD22TB4 before this, and it just suddenly quit after a couple of days. So, maybe heavy is good. (Or they knew I'd think like that and added a slab of steel to impress me? I doubt it.) Plus, it stays put. Anyhow, I spent a lot of time weighing other options, and this box feels like the perfect balance of capability and cost, and has been rock-solid. My displays come up from sleep in about 2 seconds. I have successfully used the (much less expensive) OWC "Bus-Powered 5-Port Multi-Adapter" TB3 mini-dock with my setup (including HDMI without 3rd party drivers, so go figure). However, there were a few occasions with older kernels, when it had a big problem waking up after sleep, though it seems stable with newer kernels. It's passive and has limited ports, so I have to unplug power or juggle connections when I want to add some temporary extra connection. I did briefly create a problem for myself with the UGreen dock, when I disconnected the laptop in clamshell mode, plugged something into the dock, typed some keyboard keys, power-cycled the dock, etc, before realizing I hadn't reconnected the laptop. After reconnecting, I had to open the clamshell and unlock the laptop, in order to bring back the displays. No big deal. Be aware that other docking stations that connect via USB-C only (rather than Thunderbolt) are going to require "Display Link" drivers.

Works flawlessly. Quality build with solid materials, all ports work as advertised and the profile is small enough not to get in the way. I run an M4 MBP through this and have not had so much as a single issue. I am running ethernet, audio, a video output connected to a KVM used with my Mac and PC, and wireless usb devices. I also connect 2 separate M.2 enclosures to it without issue. I have but one complaint and I hope they address this in the future. The audio jack is in the front and I want another option for the back. I worked around this by using a usb-a to 3.5mm jack adapter and run it out back which works fine but shouldn't be necessary. I think audio should have options for both front and back since it's common to use both. Overall I'd buy again without hesitating.