HAZARD 4 Grayman(TM) Pillbox: Optics Shell-Pack

Some doubts about zippers. Looks very light for such heavy rigid backpack. Should be more tough.

Escelente producto, de muy buena calidad

Ottima fattura, ma da provare sul campo. 5 stelle sulla fiducia

The best camera backpack on the market, however this pack is only suitable for camera and nothing else.

Had to return this item. The stitching was not terrible, but was by no means great. The bag itself looks amazing, but for something of this price you would expect there to be at least triple stitching on stress points, and double stitching on the rest, or at least most of the rest, this was not the case. In regards to the areas which connect the shoulder straps to the lower portion of the bag, the end of the lower strap which was stitched onto the bottom portion of the bag also had highly inadequate stitching. The top and bottom areas of the connection were double stitched, with single stitching on the sides, and a single stitched "X" pattern in the middle. The straps were the same story, they had portions which were appropriately stitched and then areas right beside running vertically up and down the strap connecting the padding to the strap body which were only single stitched (And this area would see some of the most friction/potential damage while wearing/taking off and on the bag, especially if you were in the bush) In comparison, 5.11 designed their Rush series backpacks to avoid as much as possible having any stitching exposed (besides the molly which was triple stitched), and if it was exposed, it would either be double or triple stitched (with the main exception being the back area pads which were protected by a persons back for the 5.11 Rush bags) The waist strap included would not hold when tightened (the material was too slippery). It was removable though so I did not care much since I was likely to discard it anyways. The straps themselves were not aligned equally to the center vertical axis of the bag, they were off by about 1/4 to 1/3 of an inch. This would not be noticeable with light weight, however it would put more strain on one shoulder if one were to carry heavy items for long distances. Again, not something I would care about in a cheap bag, but if your spending this much.... The hard point system is a bit of a joke… they included Velcro tabs to cover the hard points from the inside however if you were walking in heaving rain water would easily seep through, you would have to end up putting tape over the holes. This is ironic since the bag was designed to keep electronics safe. I looked online to see how much their hard point system costs, and looked up the reviews for their hard point system...better off using cord and winding it through the holes to make a mesh. Regarding the pockets, there is this one section of pockets which are completely useless, not even completely – absurdly useless. It honestly feels like whoever came up with the idea thought it would be funny, so they included it wondering if anyone would manage to find something to use it for. The pockets in question, and you’ll know which ones I’m talking about if you own the bag could maybe hold half a dollar, or a Micro SD card. They also have this molly system within the secondary inside compartment which looks nice but is again a bit useless on a practical level, large pockets would have been better. Anyways if you’ve got the money you may as well buy this bag, its more of a show piece anyways, lets not lie to ourselves. Although there are some minor issues/quirks with the bag, overall its a nice bag, (and unless you're planning on scaling mountains this bag is will be fine) and in my case if the straps were centered correctly to the vertical axis I would have happily kept it.

ポータブルエコー(sonosite M-turbo)を入れるのに使用しております。メインコンパートメントは本体と充電器入れるのでいっぱいになります。ドキュメントやそれほど暑くない本などは追加で入れられます。 蓋側のコンパートメントにはモバイルバッテリーとiPad10インチ入れてます。そこにも追加で本や薄手の上着などは入りますが、整理が難しいのと、ハードシェルという形状のため中の荷物はほぼフルオープンにしないと取り出しづらいです。背面のパソコン、タブレット入れるコンパートメントは使用してません。エコーが重いためか、荷物入れにくいためです。 積載能力的には、それまで使用していた、同社のWatson lumber sling packと同等でした(Watson lumber sling packが優秀過ぎるのだと思います、仕事用からプライベート用に変更してまだ現役です)。 荷物が重くてsling packだと疲れるのと、機材保護のため、ハードシェルバックパックにしました(荷物の重さはこのバックパック自体がそれなりに重いので増えましたが、肩頸部周りは楽になりました。 自分のニーズには合っており☆5です。しかし保護の必要な機材を入れる予定の無い人は他のbackpackのほうがいいと思います。 不満点としてはウエストベルトが締めてもすぐ緩みます。無いよりはマシですが、、、。